Skip to content
Compliant · Provably meeting the rules

Could we prove every control we've signed for?

Prove what you sign, and size the effort to the rule. Compliance busywork comes from not knowing which gaps matter. We find the ones an assessor will test, close them in ways IT can sustain, and keep regulated work in a contained environment so the rest of the business stays out of scope.

The solution

How we fix it, in three steps

  1. Step 1: Score

    A scored gap assessment against the framework your customers or contracts require.

  2. Step 2: Scope and build

    Draw the smallest defensible boundary, then build and document the controls.

  3. Step 3: Keep it

    Evidence kept current and an independent check before anyone signs.

What we usually find, and what we do about it

Your challenge

The undocumented decision

Where the regulated data lives. Most failed audit objectives trace back to it.

How we solve it

A scored gap assessment starts by documenting where regulated data lives.

CMMC & NIST 800-171 Readiness
Your challenge

Controls without proof

The control exists, the evidence does not. Auditors test evidence.

How we solve it

We build the evidence set auditors test, and keep it current month to month.

Fractional CISO (vCISO)
Your challenge

Scope creep

The whole company in scope when a handful of people touch controlled data.

How we solve it

An enclave draws the smallest defensible boundary around the people who touch controlled data.

CUI & ITAR Enclave Design and Build

Frameworks we work with

  • CMMC Level 1 and 2
  • NIST 800-171
  • DFARS 7012 and SPRS
  • ITAR and EAR
  • ISO 27001
  • TISAX
  • SOC 2 readiness
Proof

What changed for clients

See all 12 Compliant stories

Compliant

In their words

Clients' own words, shared with their permission. Some chose to name their company.

We engaged Vizius to satisfy a customer-driven requirement for a third-party cybersecurity assessment. We found them to be highly professional, able to interact efficiently with our senior leadership team, and a source of valuable perspectives on our existing security programs. They took the time to understand our business context rather than re-state 'one-size-fits-all' security doctrine. We benefited from their technical depth and expertise and were very satisfied with the deliverables. I'd recommend them to anyone that requires advanced cybersecurity consulting services.

Ehud PollackVice President, Customer Success, MDClone

We became aware of Vizius as we were beginning a major software development project. Security of the application and user data was a primary concern. We engaged their team during the design phase of the project. They've done a thorough review at each step while not slowing down the pace of development.

We went on to engage Vizius to manage our Outsourced Security Program where they assess our security controls on an ongoing basis and help us prioritize improvements to align with our industry and business size. Although this is an extensive and long-term project, the Vizius team is guiding us through the process in an engaging, comfortable way. Their expertise and guidance have been invaluable.

Working in the financial industry, we value the trust our customers place in us to manage and protect their sensitive data. I can depend on the Vizius team to know the current threats and what we need to do to defend against them. Relying on their expertise gives us peace of mind and the ability to focus on what we do best.

Barry BrinsonPresident & CEO, Vision Software Solutions

Where most clients start

CMMC & NIST 800-171 Readiness: We score you against NIST 800-171 first so effort goes where the points are, then write the SSP and close the gaps an assessor would test.

All 6 Compliant offerings

  • "Can we sign our SPRS affirmation and defend it?"

    We score you against NIST 800-171 first so effort goes where the points are, then write the SSP and close the gaps an assessor would test.

    More about CMMC & NIST 800-171 Readiness →
  • "If the auditor asked for proof tomorrow, what could we actually show?"

    We scope the certification, find the gaps, and build the evidence trail, so you know what the audit is likely to find before it starts.

    More about ISO 27001, TISAX & SOC 2 Readiness →
  • "How much of the company really has to be in scope?"

    We wall regulated engineering and CAD work into a contained, documented environment, built from code so it can be rebuilt and audited, and keep the rest of the business out of the boundary.

    More about CUI & ITAR Enclave Design and Build →
  • "Who keeps the enclave in shape after the build team leaves?"

    We run the enclave day to day: device reconciliation, application vetting, user training, changes and audit-ready records.

    More about Managed CUI & ITAR Enclave →
  • "Who owns security here, and what do we tell the board?"

    A named security leader who sets priorities, owns policies, vendors and audits, and reports progress on one page leadership can read.

    More about Fractional CISO (vCISO) →
  • "Where do our sensitive files actually end up?"

    We configure Microsoft Purview so regulated and confidential files are labeled, protected and kept where they belong, even when they travel by email or through the CRM.

    More about Sensitive Data Labeling & DLP (Microsoft Purview) →
Who you'll work with

A Principal Engineer, not a salesperson

Likely lead: Kyl Gaston or Cameron Cromer. You talk to the engineer who does the work on Compliant.

Start on your own: the blind spot check

Four questions for a quick read on all four dimensions, then three more on Compliant if you want to go deeper.

Take the check
Glenn JohnsonDavid Hyde-VolpeMax DingesCameron Cromer

Speak directly to an engineer. We're based at 141 Traction Street, Greenville, SC.

Meet the team